Mao-Xin Gong vs Raven Klaasen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gong vs Klaasen analysis and find out who is favored!
Mao-Xin Gong vs Raven Klaasen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gong 1 - 0 Klaasen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gong has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Klaasen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gong, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Klaasen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Klaasen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gong has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Klaasen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 185/ 140), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Klaasen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 160/ 114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gong winning 1 times and Klaasen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gong winning 2 and Klaasen winning 1. The last match between Gong and Klaasen was at the Australia F2, 16-02-2009, First, Grass with Mao-Xin Gong getting the victory 6-2 1-6 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gong and Klaasen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gong winning 1 times and Klaasen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gong winning 1, and Klaasen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gong has played against opponents with an average rank of while Klaasen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gong has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Klaasen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Klaasen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Ret.
Rank
294
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
208
High
41
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
55% (212-173)
Career Total W/L
56% (190-149)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$520
Career Prize Money
$29,370
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mao-Xin Gong | Raven Klaasen |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 14 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 1-6 7-6(5) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mao-Xin Gong | Raven Klaasen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mao-Xin Gong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mao-Xin Gong
Player
Min-Kyu Song
60%
(
67 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
10
Aces
10
11
Double Faults
6
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(9) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Lukas Ollert
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mao-Xin Gong
Player
Worarin Kumthonkittikul
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
38%
(
33 of
88)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Sidharth Rawat
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
61%
(
80 of
132)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
85)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
44%
(
58 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Felix Corwin
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hans Podlipnik-Castillo
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
89%
(
16 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Andreas Mies
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Eric Quigley
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
55%
(
71 of
130)
1st Serve %
54%
(
85 of
158)
19
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
6
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
48 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
67 of
158)
149
Total Points Won
139
|
7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Raven Klaasen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Benjamin Becker
Player
Raven Klaasen
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikolaus Moser
Player
Raven Klaasen
53%
(
61 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
72 of
127)
9
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
53 of
72)
69%
(
37 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
45 of
127)
120
Total Points Won
122
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Raven Klaasen
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kamil Capkovic
Player
Raven Klaasen
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ze Zhang
Player
Raven Klaasen
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve %
69%
(
11 of
16)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
12 of
12)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
26
Total Points Won
9
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matthew Barton
Player
Raven Klaasen
56%
(
64 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
131)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
54 of
82)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
54 of
131)
127
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(4) 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Raven Klaasen
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adam Feeney
Player
Raven Klaasen
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jan Hernych
Player
Raven Klaasen
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more